Basic HTML Version
48
toppled the legal barriers banning
dissemination of instruction about sex.
The moral barriers began crumbling
also.
The first World War made many
changes in behavior patterns. Women
took jobs - and kept them after the
war. Wives became financially indepen–
dent of husbands. Family and home life
began breaking down. Divorce rates
rose. War conditions produced "victory
girls" and a general relaxing of moral
standards.
World War II shot morals into the
gutter. Permissiveness became the
current fad. The psychologists intensi–
fied their propaganda. The MORAL REV·
OLUTJON was on! The world continued
throwing off the restraints.
The world at last had emerged from
the age of hush !
The devil appeared "as an angel of
light." Immorality was giveo a doak of
respectability under the catch-phrase
"The NEW MORALITY." lromorality be–
carne moral. W rong became rigbt.
And now, in just the past very few
years, morals have taken a new and
accelerating nose-dive into the cesspool.
The world has "progressed" past
"topless" restaurants
in
cities - then
past "bottomless" - aod, to entertain
certain small lust-gripped audiences, ac–
tual live sexual inte.rcourse in the nude
performed on stage! Today every form
of
sex
and mental perversion is spread–
ing at accelerated pace - homosexual–
ity, swinging, group
sex
o.rgies,
bestiality, sexual play-pens for pre–
school children, lust-arousing pornog–
raphy a giant industry, fast-growing
drug addiction - fast-increasing num–
bers of humans literally DESTROYING
THEMSELVES!
Can
this
be RJGHT?
Can
this
be best for the human
individual?
Can
this
build a healthy, happy,
prosperous nation or civilization?
WHAT, after all,
JS
right?
Do humans know right from wrong?
They have always supposed so. But
they've been WRONG!
Millions of Roman Catholics - and
probably millions of Protestants and
others - still believe any use of sex
outside of marriage is WRONG. They be–
lieve it is a SIN! But millions now fol-
The
PLAIN TRUTH
lowing the mis-oamed "New Morality''
believe complete sexual freedom is
RIGHT. They believe denial and repres–
sion are WRONG! They can't BOTH know
right from wroog!
What, then, is the TRUTH?
The truth is that the former repres–
sion and maintained ignorance was
WRONG! The results proved it. And the
new fiauoting of aJJ morality is
far
more
wrong, because it is leading to far
worse results !
The TRUTH is that the most tragi–
cally needed DlMENSION in knowledge
about
sex
and marriage has been
MISSJNG!
This vital dimension has not beco
known. Freud did not know it! Today's
psychologists are ignorant of this vital
dimension of knowledge.
lt
was missing
frorn the knowledge disseminated by a
traditional Christianity which set moral
codes for so maoy centuries.
And, what they did not, and do not
know, they simply did not, and do not
know that they don't know it!
Can there be ANYTHING more impor–
tant to know?
The Missiog Dimension
Recently Ambassador College pub–
lished, as a public service, not to be
soJd, a VERY JMPORTANT
BOOK.
Jt
Ís a
book of 236 pages, titled,
The Missing
Dimension in Sex.
This important book makes plaio the
MISSING DlMENSION in knowJedge of
sex and marriage. It makes plaio the
reason WHY this vital knowledge has
been missing!
It gives fraok answers to questions
you may have been too embarrassed to
ask! I t's a surprising, eye-openiog
book.
Jt is a message of UNDERSTANDING in
the wilderoess of confusion.
When I see all these current news–
paper stories and magazine articles
reporting the TRAGJC facts that threaten
the very existence of human society on
earth, 1 feel 1 simply
have
to do what
may be done to get the TRUE ANSWER
to the morals problem before as maoy
rnillion people as possible.
If
I could
give you the answer here, in
The
PLAIN
TRUTH, 1 wouJd. But space does not
permit. So I offer, entirely gratis,
yo11r
free copy on request, postpaid.
It
is
knowledge heretofore unpublished.
O
August
1971
tt/Jat-
Our
READERS SAY
( Conti111red from inside front co·ver)
some misrake about
this,
we thought. Ir
would be others thar ger killed in Vietnam,
bur not our Robert. He told us when he
left lhat he would be back, but he didn't
tell us he would be shipped back in a
casker.
"We have asked a thousand poople al–
ready (and many of them very intelligent
people too) why Robert had to be shipped
12,000
miles from home ro rhe other sidc
of the globe to be slaughtered, but no one
(absolutely
no
one) has been able ro give
us the answer."
"What our family is now concerned
about is: Did our Robert die in vaio ?"
Peter A. K.,
Linroo, North Dakota
"1 was urterly dismayed and astOnished
at your article in the last issue on the Viet–
nam war.
I
could hardly believe it could
find a place in the same magazine with
a
previous article 'To
Kili
a People' by Gar–
ner Armstrong."
Vivían
F.,
Newman, California
"Your editorial of March
16,
written for
!he May issue of your magazine, is the
greatest disappointment since President
Nixon's Vietnamizarion announcement.
1
have felt for a long time that we need
good meo imbued with the spirit of broth–
erly !ove and tolerance for other ideol–
ogies, to heal !he breach berween
Communism and Capitalism.
1
had hoped
that your magazine would seek to produce
such men for our nation.
"Surely you will agree that Russian com–
rnunism has changed since Stalin, and that
it will continue ro d1ange and evolve into
a system that is part communist and part
capitalist?
"Thece is much good to be learned from
Communism and from Communist China,
and
1
think that we had better apply our–
selves to learning it
il
we want to help
Sourheast Asia."
Mes. N. A. E.,
Rice Lake, Wisconsin
"At last- the plain truth about the
way your organization thinks about the
Viet Nam war. Nothing more than an
insipid restatement of the long-discredited
domino theory. Ho Chi Minh might have
been on our side
i(
we had possessed the
intelligcnce to see what he was really up
to, instead of supposing that we must
crush all anti-capitalists in the wocld,
especially the smaller
ones,
who are less
dangerous tO fight. Ho certainly made
overtures in our direction in the
1940's.
But we have lost our revolutiooary fervor
and we have given up our principies for
capitalist propaganda. As a resulr, we
opposed him rnstead of befriending him."
}ohn E. Chappell
)c.
Ogden, Utah