Page 4511 - 1970S

Basic HTML Version

in Egypt. We must assume the !sra–
elites had ceased to observe their
sacred Sabbath day. By the time they
left Egypt they had no idea upon
which day the Sabbath fell. t>robably
they were forced to gather bricks and
straw seven days a week. Their slav–
ery was total!
Finally God sent Moses and Aaron
to Pharaoh with a message: "Let my
people go, that they may hold a feasl
unto me
in the wi/derness"
(Ex. 5:1}.
Obviously religious festiva ls were
held in disfavor anywhere in "civil–
ized" Egypt. Afterwards Moses re–
peatedly pleaded with Pharaoh: "Let
my people go, that they may serve
their God." But the Egyptian Pha–
raoh was obstínate. He stubbornly
refused until the land of Egypt was
drenched witb the blood of his own
people.
In the interim he had suggested
self-serving solutions: "Go, serve the
Lord; your children also may go with
you; only Jet your flocks and your
herds
remain behind"
(Ex. 10:24,
RSV). This kind of extortion is not
without its parallels today. But
Moses protested: "Our cattle also
must go with us; not a hoof shall be
left behind" (Ex. 10:26, RSV). He
did not compromise one whit wilh
this archextortioner.
Finally the lsraelites were deliv–
ered from Egyptian slavery. For a
short time there was one nation on
this earth enjoying total religious lib–
erly. But their freedoms were short–
lived. Very soon they were involved
in a whole series of periodic slaveries.
The book of Judges in the Old Testa–
ment depicts one foreign invasion af–
ler another, with each one being fol–
lowed by brief deliverances brought
about by various Judges. It is very
unlikely that any of these invaders
allowed much religious freedom.
They were devoted to their gods.
Shortly after Solomon's reign, Is–
rael and Judah split into two entirely
separale nalions. And in a matter of
a very few centur ies one followed lhe
olher into captivity. The norlhern
house of Israel never did relurn to
Palestine. But a colony of the Jews
was sent back to Jerusalem during
the time of Ezra and Nehemiah.
For untold centuries the city of
Jerusalem has been a symbol of reli–
gious liberty and freedom lo more
than one faith. Ironically, bolh lhe
8
civil and religious leaders lurned this
symbol of liberty and freedom into
one of bondage by the time of Christ.
And do not blame the Romans for
this strange lurnaboul of events. The
Roman Empire allowed the Jewish
vassal slate a measure of both civil
and religious freedom.
Jesus Chrlst Struggles for
Religious Llberty
Jesus of Nazareth conslantly argued
against the abuses of lhe lheological
system of His day. Jesus charged:
"But woe to you, scribes and Phari–
sees, hypocrites [the religionists of
the day]! Because you shut the king–
dom of heaven againsl men; for you
neither enter yourselves, nor allow
lhose who would enter to go in"
(Matt. 23: 13). Thal was a serious
indictment! The clergy was, in effect,
prohibiting the true worship of God.
Jesus' attempts to free men spiri–
tually were soon met with stiff oppo–
sition. Persecution from religious
leaders set in swiftly. Repeatedly the
leading members of the Sanhedrin
plotted against Jesus (see John
11 :48-53}.
.
The apostles who followed Jesus
suffered similar persecutions. Final–
ly, by
A.D.
135, both the adherents of
Christianity and Judaism were driv–
en out of Jerusalem. The Romans did
crack down-and hard. Fi rst the ar–
mies of Titus in
A.O.
70; then the
crushing of the Bar-Cocheba rebel–
lion in
A.o.
135.
Except for the "little flock" (Luke
12:32}, the true Church forced vir–
tually underground by persecution,
men did not really follow J esus
Christ and Moses in the many centu–
ries that ensued. Followers of Simon
the Sorcerer, who became the Ro–
man Catholic Church, professed to
teach and practice lhe true religion,
but their doctrines were perversions
of the truth. Christianity was stained
by the Crusades and the Spanish In–
quisition. Religious battles raged
throughout Europe in lhe Dark Ages.
The soil of the Old World was
drenched with the blood of millions
of martyrs. Tyndale lost bis life for
daring to translate lhe Scriptures
into everyday English. Church
lead~
ers had feared spiritual anarchy if
every man had his own Bible. The
church-state scheme of things was
not working out.
In quest for religious liberty and
freedom of worship, men and women
began lo leave the persecutions of lhe
Old World for the challenges of the
New. But their persecutors were not
far behind. Pioneer thinking in Prot–
estant arcas whicb sougbt the supre–
macy of the individual conscience in
religious matters was being overlak–
en by l'igid Puritanism.
Early American Battles for
Religlous Freedoms
The Founding Fathers clearly per–
ceived that lhe religiopolilical
scheme of joint sovereignty had not
prolected human rigbts nor freedom
of conscience in the nations of Eu–
rope. Church and state had mixed
like oil and water. Sorne other system
simply had to be found.
The Declaration of Independence
and the Constitution of the United
States are both on display in lhe
Library of Congress. Let us now be–
gin to understand how these and
other important documents carne to
be formulated. But we are not un–
aware of the fact that you cannot
have religious freedom wi thout po–
litical freedom. The two hang to-
. gether.
The Founding Fathers of this na–
tion carne to our shores to escape the
clutches of state-sponsored religions
that used the power of the state lo
persecute those of different religious
beliefs. The Founding Fathers knew
that religion had to be separated
from political aulhority. No person,
they firmly believed, should be inter–
fered with by the state in his right to
believe or not to believe, or to affil–
iate or not to affiliale wilh a
church.
Bul do not lhink that these abuses,
injustices and outrages were confincd
solely to England and the continent
of Europe. Many in the thirteen colo–
nies were adamantly opposed to this
"new order of things" taking shape in
the minds of thinking men through–
out New England and the other
American colonies. l ndeed, a heavy
"loyalist" element was present right
up to 1776 and even beyond.
Soon the very religious intolerance
which our forefathers fted from Eu–
rope to escape was plaguing the
American colonies. For instance, a
law emerged on the statute books of
Virginia in 1610 requiring Sunday
The
PLAIN TRUTH June-July 1979