Basic HTML Version
1
to show cause is concerned, against everybody; is that right?
2
3
NR. H. CHOD05:
Yes, Your Honor.
THE COURT:
In line with the sugqestion about limiting
4
to the charitable corporations, I am looking at Paragraph,
5
Sub-B, on Page 2, at Line 17.
Would it be necessary, with
6
that thought in mind, to have limiting language at that
7
point?
8
�R. H. CHODOS:
Well, it seems to me, Your Honor, that
9
at the hearing on the order to show cause, after there is
10
notice, the Court has power to extend the injunction to all
11
the
defendants, and that the proper time to limit
it
is when
12
the responsive showing is made.
13
14
15
15
17
18
19
THE COURT:
All right.
In other words, what you are
really saying
is
that the temporary restraining order is the
only one which should be limited, the proposed temporary
restraining order.
MR. H. CHODOS:
That is our position.
THE COURT:
All right.
I have read your bond
argunent.
Are you suggesting that cespite what is contained
20
on Page 3, at Line 5, that no bond is required at all?
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
bond
MR. H. CHODOS:
No, Your Honor.
We believe that no
In a receiver action, there are two bonds.
One
is from the plaintiff --
THE COURT:
You are talking about the receiver's'bond?
MR. H. CHODOS:
This is the receiver's bond, and I
believe Judge Weisman must post a l:ond.
(
THE COURT:
All right.
What would you suggest that
28
bond ought to be?
11