Page 531 - COG Publications

Basic HTML Version

1
suggest is that the plaintiff should take a taste to
2
determine whether it is a mushroom or a toadstool." And
3
that is essentially what we are faced with here.
4
Nobody can tell Your Honor how many pieces of
5
paper arc being shredded per minute, per hour, per day.
6
THE COURT: If any.
7
MR. 'l'l\PPER: If any. We de believe that they are
8
being shredded. We don't believe that the information that
9
there is a shredder in his offices is fictional; but by the
10
same token, we haven't seen the shredder.
11
THE COUFT: There can also be ligitimate uses for
12
them, although maybe we ought to tell the city attorney that.
13
14
15
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Go ahead.
MR. TAPPER: I suppose. But the records we are talking
about are public records, just as the assets that Hillel ,
in describing the ch3ritable organizations, are also public
assets.
I share the thought that perhaps it will be
premature to use these remedies ex parte as to non-charitable
entities at this time, but I am very concerned about the Big
Sandy transaction. I am very concerned about the evidence
that has been presented to us of some fifty -- I haven't seen
all the deeds -- but it is alleged that there have been
fifty real estate transactions in a period of five to six
months. That works out to ten per month. So if it is just
merely on an averaging basis, there is a virtual certainty
that there are going to be some more pieces of real estate
that are going to change hands, and that, again, is going
7