Basic HTML Version
he has
to
do that in the name of.and on behalf of the
2
charitable funds ane this Court.
3
Now, the real problem, therefore, I don't know
4
what can be done if the land has cnaged hands by the time
5
we get to it, we may have to sue to rescind in the Texas
6
courts.
7
It is my understanding that a receiver has,
8
under that statute, the power to sue and be $Ued in other
9
actions on behalf of the interest he represents.
10
THE COURT: The order which would be drawn appointing
11
him can specifically grant him that power, and he may have
12
it inherently.
13
MR. H� CHODOS: That is right. Furthermore, I believe
14
15
6
1/
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
that
Well, let me say, what we are asking here -- and it
may be that the order
the temporary order perhaps should
be more limited in scope than the order to show cause. The
one thing that is clear �o me that you have the power to
do is to appoint a receiver for the three charitable
corporations. The other corporations we have named are
alleged to be fronts, depositories of charitable funds.
We have substantial reason to believe that that
is true and that we can prove it. But it may be that the
taking control of those entities and the interference with
those entities ought to be postponed until after a hearing
has been held.
But for the charitable corporations themselves,
we have a substantial chance of emmence dissipation in the
immediate future. And in the nature of things, we believe
5